vs
Jira vs Wrike: which is better?
Jira vs Wrike compared on agile boards, resource planning, proofing, and price, with a pick for software teams and PMOs.
By AIStackMatch Editorial · Updated
Quick verdict
Quick verdict
Jira is the agile issue tracker for software teams. Wrike is the heavier work manager for resource planning, proofing, and cross-team reporting. They solve different jobs. A software team should not pick Wrike to replace a backlog, and a creative operations team should not pick Jira to run approvals.
Choose Jira if...
- Engineers run Scrum or Kanban with a backlog and sprint reports
- You depend on Confluence, Bitbucket, GitHub, or GitLab
- You want a free plan for up to 10 users
Choose Wrike if...
- You need Gantt charts plus resource and workload planning
- Creative proofing and request approvals are part of the job
- A PMO reports across departments, not only across a sprint
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure
Comparison table
Scroll sideways on small screens. Scores are editorial assessments from our methodology.
| Criteria | Jira | Wrike | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Software and engineering teams running agile sprints and issue tracking | Mid-sized and large teams needing resource planning and cross-department reporting | - |
| Free plan | Yes. Free for up to 10 users with 2GB of storage. | Yes. Free plan with essential task management, board and table views. | - |
| Starting price | Free (10 users), paid from about $7.91 per user/month | Free, paid from $10 per user/month | - |
| Ease of use | 2/5 Powerful but complex. Non-technical users often struggle. | 3/5 Capable but dense; takes time to configure. | Wrike |
| Project management | 5/5 Best-in-class for agile software projects, backlogs and sprints. | 5/5 Gantt, resource planning and approvals are strong. | Tie |
| Collaboration | 4/5 Good for engineering collaboration; docs live in Confluence. | 4/5 Proofing and approvals help creative teams. | Tie |
| Customization | 5/5 Highly configurable workflows, fields and issue types. | 4/5 Custom item types and workflows on higher tiers. | Jira |
| Integrations | 5/5 Huge Atlassian Marketplace and developer tool integrations. | 4/5 Solid enterprise integrations. | Jira |
| Value for money | 4/5 Free for 10 users and competitively priced for engineering teams. | 3/5 Higher per-user cost and seat bundles. | Jira |
Pricing
Jira
Jira is free for up to 10 users. Standard costs about $7.91 and Premium about $14.54 per user/month, with Enterprise on custom pricing. Per-user prices vary with team size.
Wrike
Team costs $10 per user/month and Business $25 per user/month, billed annually. Pinnacle and Apex are custom. Seats are sold in bundles, for example in groups of 5 up to 30 seats.
Winner by category
- Ease of useWrike
- Project managementTie
- CollaborationTie
- CustomizationJira
- IntegrationsJira
- Value for moneyJira
Category wins: Jira 3, Wrike 1, ties 2. The right pick depends on your workflow, not the tally.
Final recommendation
Jira when the work is software delivery. Wrike when the work is resourcing, proofing, and portfolio reporting. ClickUp is the option when you want sprints and workload in one tool at a lower seat price than Wrike Team.
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure
Frequently asked questions
Is Jira or Wrike better for software teams?
Jira. It is built for sprints, backlogs, and issue workflows, and it is free for up to 10 users. Wrike can track work, but it is aimed at broader project and resource management.
Which is cheaper, Jira or Wrike?
Jira is free for up to 10 users, then about $7.91 per user/month on Standard. Wrike Team is $10 per user/month billed annually, Business is $25, and seats are sold in bundles.
Can Wrike replace Jira?
For creative and operational projects, often yes. For sprint planning and developer integrations, no.