monday.com vs Jira: which is better?
monday.com vs Jira compared on ease of use, agile boards, dashboards and price, with a pick for software and other teams.
By AIStackMatch Editorial · Updated
Quick verdict
Quick verdict
Jira is the agile tool for software teams: backlogs, sprints and developer integrations. monday.com is the visual board for marketing, operations and other groups that will not learn an issue tracker. Use Jira for engineering. Use monday.com when the rest of the company needs a board.
Choose monday.com if...
- Non-technical teammates need colorful boards and dashboards
- The work is campaigns, requests or operations, not a sprint backlog
- You may add monday CRM or another monday.com product later
Choose Jira if...
- Engineers run Scrum or Kanban with a backlog and sprint reports
- You rely on Confluence, Bitbucket, GitHub or GitLab
- Custom issue workflows matter more than a simple board
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure
Comparison table
Scroll sideways on small screens. Scores are editorial assessments from our methodology.
| Criteria | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Cross-functional teams that like visual boards, dashboards and no-code automation | Software and engineering teams running agile sprints and issue tracking | - |
| Free plan | Yes. Free plan for up to 2 seats, with up to 3 boards and 3 docs. | Yes. Free for up to 10 users with 2GB of storage. | - |
| Starting price | Free (2 seats), paid from $9 per seat/month | Free (10 users), paid from about $7.91 per user/month | - |
| Ease of use | 4/5 Visual boards are quick to understand and adopt. | 2/5 Powerful but complex. Non-technical users often struggle. | monday.com |
| Project management | 4/5 Good views and automations, with some advanced features on higher plans. | 5/5 Best-in-class for agile software projects, backlogs and sprints. | Jira |
| Collaboration | 4/5 Updates, mentions and shared boards support team coordination. | 4/5 Good for engineering collaboration; docs live in Confluence. | Tie |
| Customization | 4/5 Flexible boards and columns, though less open-ended than ClickUp or Notion. | 5/5 Highly configurable workflows, fields and issue types. | Jira |
| Integrations | 4/5 Wide integration and automation options. | 5/5 Huge Atlassian Marketplace and developer tool integrations. | Jira |
| Value for money | 3/5 Tiered features can increase cost for small teams. | 4/5 Free for 10 users and competitively priced for engineering teams. | Jira |
Pricing
monday.com
Work Management Basic costs about $9, Standard $12 and Pro $19 per seat/month on annual billing, with higher monthly rates. Enterprise is custom. Prices may display in local currency, and monday CRM, Service and Dev are priced separately.
Jira
Jira is free for up to 10 users. Standard costs about $7.91 and Premium about $14.54 per user/month, with Enterprise on custom pricing. Per-user prices vary with team size.
Winner by category
- Ease of usemonday.com
- Project managementJira
- CollaborationTie
- CustomizationJira
- IntegrationsJira
- Value for moneyJira
Category wins: monday.com 1, Jira 4, ties 1. The right pick depends on your workflow, not the tally.
Final recommendation
Jira for the engineering backlog. monday.com for visual work across other teams. ClickUp is the option when you want sprints and a board the rest of the company can use without a second subscription.
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure
Frequently asked questions
Is monday.com or Jira better for software teams?
Jira. It is built for sprints, backlogs and issue tracking, and it is free for up to 10 users. monday.com can show a board, but it is not an engineering issue tracker.
Which is cheaper, monday.com or Jira?
Jira is free for up to 10 users, then about $7.91 per user/month on Standard. monday.com Basic is about $9 per seat/month on annual billing, and the free plan is capped at 2 seats.
Can monday.com replace Jira?
For cross-functional work, often yes. For sprint planning and developer workflows, no.