vs
Asana vs monday.com: which is better?
Asana vs monday.com compared on pricing, ease of use, project management, integrations and customization, with a clear pick for each type of team.
By AIStackMatch Editorial · Updated
Quick verdict
Quick verdict
Asana is the better pure project management tool, with stronger timelines, portfolios and integrations. monday.com is more visual and flexible, and stretches into CRM and service workflows. Choose Asana for structured project work and monday.com for visual, cross-functional boards.
Choose Asana if...
- Projects with clear owners, timelines and dependencies
- Cross-project reporting through portfolios and goals
- You rely on a wide set of integrations
Choose monday.com if...
- Your team thinks in visual boards and dashboards
- You want one platform for projects plus CRM or service work
- Non-technical teammates need to adopt it fast
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure
Comparison table
Scroll sideways on small screens. Scores are editorial assessments from our methodology.
| Criteria | Asana | monday.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams that need clear ownership, timelines and cross-project reporting | Cross-functional teams that like visual boards, dashboards and no-code automation | - |
| Free plan | Yes. Free Personal plan for very small use, currently limited to 2 users. | Yes. Free plan for up to 2 seats, with up to 3 boards and 3 docs. | - |
| Starting price | Free, paid from $10.99 per user/month | Free (2 seats), paid from $9 per seat/month | - |
| Ease of use | 4/5 Clean and easy to adopt, with sensible defaults. | 4/5 Visual boards are quick to understand and adopt. | monday.com |
| Project management | 5/5 Timelines, dependencies and portfolios are well executed. | 4/5 Good views and automations, with some advanced features on higher plans. | Asana |
| Collaboration | 4/5 Clear ownership and comments keep teams aligned. | 4/5 Updates, mentions and shared boards support team coordination. | Tie |
| Customization | 3/5 Custom fields and rules help, but it is more opinionated than ClickUp or Notion. | 4/5 Flexible boards and columns, though less open-ended than ClickUp or Notion. | monday.com |
| Integrations | 5/5 One of the broadest integration catalogs in this group. | 4/5 Wide integration and automation options. | Asana |
| Value for money | 3/5 Good product, but higher tiers can get expensive as teams grow. | 3/5 Tiered features can increase cost for small teams. | Tie |
Pricing
Asana
Starter costs $10.99 per user/month billed annually ($13.49 monthly) and Advanced costs $24.99 per user/month billed annually ($30.49 monthly). Enterprise is custom. AI usage beyond included allowances is billed separately.
monday.com
Work Management Basic costs about $9, Standard $12 and Pro $19 per seat/month on annual billing, with higher monthly rates. Enterprise is custom. Prices may display in local currency, and monday CRM, Service and Dev are priced separately.
Winner by category
- Ease of usemonday.com
- Project managementAsana
- CollaborationTie
- Customizationmonday.com
- IntegrationsAsana
- Value for moneyTie
Category wins: Asana 2, monday.com 2, ties 2. The right pick depends on your workflow, not the tally.
Final recommendation
Pick Asana when project discipline and reporting matter most. Pick monday.com when visual clarity and flexibility across teams matter more. If budget is the deciding factor, ClickUp covers much of both at a lower price.
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Read our affiliate disclosure
Frequently asked questions
Is Asana better than monday.com?
For structured project management, usually yes. For visual, flexible workflows across departments, monday.com is often the better fit.
Which is cheaper, Asana or monday.com?
monday.com Basic starts at about $9 per seat/month billed annually, while Asana Starter costs $10.99 per user/month billed annually.
Which is easier to use?
Both are approachable. monday.com's visual boards tend to feel more intuitive to non-technical teams.